Unix environments for Windows

One thing I miss about my Mac is having a usable Unix environment. Now I have two on my Windows machine, with different significant flaws. MacOS isn’t a great Unix, but it’s perfectly adequate for basic stuff. And it’s really handy having tools like rsync and command line ssh around. Windows has its own command line world with the venerable CMD.EXE (DOS) and the newer PowerShell. But screw that, I want Unix. Here are options.

Ubuntu-on-Windows (WSL)

This is the new hotness from Microsoft and is very nice. It feels like a legitimate Ubuntu environment. Except so far it doesn’t support networked filesystems.

WSL sits as its own OS on top of the NT kernel, just like Windows is an OS on the NT kernel. There’s not a proper Linux kernel running, instead Microsoft has emulated the Linux kernel at the syscall interface. The userspace then runs stock Ubuntu, actual Ubuntu x64 binaries unmodified. It’s an impressive piece of work.

The drawback is not everything works. ping doesn’t work unless you run bash as Administrator. (Some docs I’ve read say ICMP isn’t implemented at all.) Filesystems are limited. USB drives don’t work. Network file shares don’t work. There’s no NFS support in the Linux image, nor is there FUSE support. The view of the underlying Windows filesystem (in /mnt/c) is a bit strange too, like I can’t see a proper view of my Desktop folder. In general stuff that works seems to work right, and the Microsoft team is moving fast in adding new features. I’m tempted to join Windows Insider just to start running betas, but I think I have to get a whole new Windows version, not just an upgrade to WSL.

There is an honest /sbin/init process running in WSL, PID 1, but its only child by default is the bash shell you start the thing with. So no init scripts / systemd running services. You can open multiple bash processes that can all see each other and share a filesystem. But if you close the last bash, you lose the whole WSL environment, which makes daemons a bit awkward.

Other names for this system are Windows Subsystem for Linux (aka WSL) and “Bash on Ubuntu on Windows”. Note these make for awkward search terms on Google.


The granddaddy of Unix emulation for Windows. I haven’t tried it in a few years, but I used to hate its package manager and its approach to Windows integration. Weird path names and environment. But it works pretty well and has a significant set of tools. MobaXterm bundles Cygwin in with an X server and terminal emulator.


The other venerable Unix option for Windows, some evolution of msys / msys2 / MinGW / mgwin32 / MinGW-w64. It has some Cygwin roots in it too, I’m not sure how much, but the mingw philosophy is to make things more like Windows and less like Unix. The result is a lighter weight Unix environment with some compromises. For instance symlinks aren’t supported because they wouldn’t work in Win32 apps. So instead creating a symlink makes a copy of the file, which is pretty damn broken but you can live with it. The crazy neat thing is the Unix programs like make are actually Windows executables like MAKE.EXE and will work fine in Windows, without bootstrapping a Unix environment. Handy for ssh.

There’s no visible init process, you just have a naked bash running according to ps, although its PPID shows as 1. Software is managed via pacman (as used in Arch Linux), there’s a large variety of packages and a toolchain for building your own. I’m not wild about the package and software versions and a bunch of basic stuff isn’t installed by default (like tar). Also some of the tools have idiosyncracies. And I have some problems like Ctrl-C not interrupting IO bound bash scripts. But it’s definitely a usable Linux environment, just not Ubuntu.

Git for Windows (aka msysGit)

This shows up as a recommended Unix option. It’s a tight, easy to install bash shell plus enough related utilities to run git. It is based on msys2, some of the history is here. It does not include much though, like there’s no rsync. And no compiler toolchain, no package manager for installing more stuff. It’s great for providing a git command line though.

Terminal window

Unix programs really want to be running in an xterm/vt100 emulator. There’s a bunch out there. I’m liking Cmder, which is an enhancement wrapper for ConEmu. mintty is another option, that’s what msys2 uses by default. wsltty is a customization of mintty for WSL. MobaXterm is also popular. Note that PuTTY/SecureCRT is not really needed any more. They are a combination of terminal emulator + ssh, but now you can just use a simple emulator plus OpenSSH command line. Still working on a good ssh-agent solution though.


As a historical footnote, WSL is not the first unmodified Ubuntu to run on Windows. There’s also andLinux, based on coLinux, a cooperative VM. There’s some other Unix-alike Windows options out there too, I think mostly abandoned. See also Interix and Windows Services for UNIX.